Buddhism vs. Hinduism

Buddhism and Hinduism have differences in their military stations on the self and needs. In cleverness of Buddhism and Hinduisms posts on self and desires, I would rather see Hinduism. In Hinduism, the space that we argon striving for is brahmin. In Buddhism, the place that we argon striving for is Buddha-nature. However, these argon non the same thing they are still structurally parallel. They both represent our deepest potential in their respective traditions. Also Brahman and Buddha-nature both dwell within. The Hinduism position on the self is vastly different from Buddhism position on the self. Buddhists believe in anatta, which means no self. They believe that on that point is no self, only an ever-changing series of condition states. Hindus, on the other hand, believe in self, atman and Brahman. The belief is that ego is the individual living now, atman is the person creation reborn, and Brahman is the unlimited cosmos. egotism is on the surface, a tman is interred slightly underneath ego, and Brahman is buried way under atman and whence hard to grasp. Buddhists do not believe that there is an ego, atman, or Brahman. The Buddhist position on desires is that they reject them.

They say that the desire for aesthesis pleasures and world-weary conquest is not only unsatisfactory, but bad in itself, the desire for measureless being is thirst for non-existence or existence, and therefore bad, and the by-line of desires leads you away from liberation. Hindus, however, embrace desires. They say that the desire for sense pleasures and worldly success are good , but unsatisfactory, the desire for infini! te being is part of the highest good, and the pursuit of desires leads you toward liberation. Hindus say the desire for infinite being is part of the highest good. I would follow Hinduism not only because I oppose more... If you want to get a secure essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper