The United States Needs a Terrorism Czar :: Argumentative Persuasive Essays

The coupled States Needs a Terrorism Czar   Introduction   Drug trafficking activeness and terrorist act exercise ease up much in common.  both medicates and terrorism have pie-eyed national security and law enforcement comp mavennts, they have troops components, border control components, economic and trade components, medical components, and agricultural components.  at once there are some 50 federal agencies with some stagecoach of counter medicate responsibilities and at least 12 federal agencies with important counterterrorism responsibilities.  This paper examines one model for unifying them under an executive branch, White House directors office, as outlined below.   Drug trafficking and terrorism are illegal clandestine activities with strong national security and law enforcement threat components and operational similarities.  Terrorists like drug traffickers, need weapons and engage in violence to achieve goals.  Terror ists, like drug traffickers, are often involved in hiding and laundering sources of funds.  Both terrorists and drug traffickers operate transnationally, and often get logistical and operational nominate from local ethnic satellite communities.  Both groups often rely on the criminal community for support they may need smuggled weapons, hammer documents and safe houses to operate effectively.  Finally, both groups need a steady bills flow to operate.  In the case of terrorists, where separate sources of funding are chop-chop diminishing, drug trafficking is an attractive funding option. Increasingly, terrorist organizations are looking to criminal activity and specifically the drug trade as a source of funding.  The FARC (Revolutionary arm Forces, a guerilla force) in Colombia are but one of umteen cases in point.   Some experts have looked to the drug czar model in seeking to reform government structures to fight terrorism.  Counternarc otics efforts have forced local, state and federal agencies to build operable, cooperative, inter-agency relationships. The need to build and maximize similar relationships to get away with terrorism exists and some have suggested that the Drug Czar White House parting of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) model may have applicability to the counterterrorism arena. Legislation is currently before Congress on this make do H.R. 4210.  It appears that the bill will not be enacted this year but will likely be reintroduced next term.     Another structural option talent require that federal departments and agencies make their counterterrorism capabilities available for the efforts of the terrorism director.